Jodi Arias #4

gpw wrote:Well got banned again on Webslaughter. This time get this I simply reported what a big shot attorney friend told me yesterday.
She said jury reached a temp. verdict yesterday and want to spend some time double checking everthing today.
That's it..I get banned

Really, gpw, whether you got banned at Websleuths or not and your/their reasons for it are off topic to this forum and this thread.

From what I have seen of your comments, you deserve it. imo

Maybe I need more coffee, but I'm not in the mood for this.

Nan11 wrote:

gpw wrote:Well got banned again on Webslaughter. This time get this I simply reported what a big shot attorney friend told me yesterday.
She said jury reached a temp. verdict yesterday and want to spend some time double checking everthing today.
That's it..I get banned

Really, gpw, whether you got banned at Websleuths or not and your/their reasons for it are off topic to this forum and this thread.

From what I have seen of your comments, you deserve it. imo

Maybe I need more coffee, but I'm not in the mood for this.

Well good morning to you too!

Nan11 wrote:I don't really even want to think about this right now; but, at least it would be something. Anything to prevent this girl from becomimg rich and skipping off to Europe to raise children.

I know her paradise wouldn't last. She will murder again. I'm praying, however, that she will not be allowed the opportunity.

ABC 15 | Jodi Arias trial verdict: What if she's found not guilty?

Cook believes a civil lawsuit, if victorious, could prevent Arias from profiting from the crimes if she’s found not guilty during the criminal trial.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

There is no way she will be acquitted, not in this lifetime..

She's done too much harm to herself, never mind the slaughter of Travis.

I believe this jury will have a just verdict..nothing less than the top charge of murder....

papapi wrote:Here we go again. Another day of verdict watch. Wondering why the jury decided on the second full day of deliberations to come in late... according to the schedule they set themselves last Friday.

Nan11 wrote:

papapi wrote:Here we go again. Another day of verdict watch. Wondering why the jury decided on the second full day of deliberations to come in late... according to the schedule they set themselves last Friday.

Thanks for this, Papapi! I hadn't heard that the 10:00 am start was a time they had set on Friday.

Here I am--for another day--biting my nails and wondering what to expect. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

I thought the jurors set their schedule from 9:00AM to 4:30PM??

Were they late yesterday?

Hoping they reached their verdict and just wanted to sleep on it...I can't imagine they hadn't already came to a decision by the questions they asked..

This is a short video mentioning a few of Arias' recent tweets.

I did try to embed it, but I couldn't find the 'embed code.' {sigh}

ABC News VIDEO | Arias Twitter Active While Jury Deliberates
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Nan11 wrote:I don't really even want to think about this right now; but, at least it would be something. Anything to prevent this girl from becomimg rich and skipping off to Europe to raise children.

I know her paradise wouldn't last. She will murder again. I'm praying, however, that she will not be allowed the opportunity.

ABC 15 | Jodi Arias trial verdict: What if she's found not guilty?

Cook believes a civil lawsuit, if victorious, could prevent Arias from profiting from the crimes if she’s found not guilty during the criminal trial.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Think OJ. If she somehow escapes criminal prosecution, she will be sued civilally like OJ was and she'd lose bigtime just like he did. She won't be able to profit from this

I haven't looked into details of AZ laws and statutes. If by some absolutely abominable miscarriage of justice Arias is found not guilty, would she then be able to seek any sort of immunity from civil prosecution? That would be truly sick and twisted if she could.

papapi wrote:Here we go again. Another day of verdict watch. Wondering why the jury decided on the second full day of deliberations to come in late... according to the schedule they set themselves last Friday.

Nan11 wrote:

papapi wrote:Here we go again. Another day of verdict watch. Wondering why the jury decided on the second full day of deliberations to come in late... according to the schedule they set themselves last Friday

Thanks for this, Papapi! I hadn't heard that the 10:00 am start was a time they had set on Friday.

Here I am--for another day--biting my nails and wondering what to expect. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

LiveLaughLove wrote:

papapi wrote:Here we go again. Another day of verdict watch. Wondering why the jury decided on the second full day of deliberations to come in late... according to the schedule they set themselves last Friday.

Nan11 wrote:

papapi wrote:Here we go again. Another day of verdict watch. Wondering why the jury decided on the second full day of deliberations to come in late... according to the schedule they set themselves last Friday.

Thanks for this, Papapi! I hadn't heard that the 10:00 am start was a time they had set on Friday.

Here I am--for another day--biting my nails and wondering what to expect. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

I thought the jurors set their schedule from 9:00AM to 4:30PM??

Were they late yesterday?

Hoping they reached their verdict and just wanted to sleep on it...I can't imagine they hadn't already came to a decision by the questions they asked..

Okay. My apologies!
I really do need more coffee. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

I think I've got it--the jury set their schedule that they would deliberate from 9 am to 4:30 pm; and now they wanted to come in at 10 am, for this one day apparently.

The speculation is rampant that it is because they have a verdict and they just wanted to sleep on it.

We'll see, folks. We'll soon see. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

LiveLaughLove wrote:

papapi wrote:Here we go again. Another day of verdict watch. Wondering why the jury decided on the second full day of deliberations to come in late... according to the schedule they set themselves last Friday.

Nan11 wrote:

papapi wrote:Here we go again. Another day of verdict watch. Wondering why the jury decided on the second full day of deliberations to come in late... according to the schedule they set themselves last Friday.

Thanks for this, Papapi! I hadn't heard that the 10:00 am start was a time they had set on Friday.

Here I am--for another day--biting my nails and wondering what to expect. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

I thought the jurors set their schedule from 9:00AM to 4:30PM??

Were they late yesterday?

Hoping they reached their verdict and just wanted to sleep on it...I can't imagine they hadn't already came to a decision by the questions they asked..

That's what I'm wondering. They did set their schedule to be 9am to 4:30pm originally, and each day until verdict is reached. Then they changed it up for this second full day to start at 10am. This just seems a bit odd to me.

If my recollection is correct, the civil trial was in US court rather than state court as it involved a violation of Ron Goldman's civil rights. State laws wouldn't be able to trump federal laws so I don't think Arizona can protect Jodi there

Nan11 wrote:
The speculation is rampant that it is because they have a verdict and they just want to sleep on it.

We'll see, folks. We'll soon see. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

That would make sense. It'll be a circus when they announce the verdict so I'm sure they wouldn't want to do that at 5 or 6pm local time. They'd be there all evening. However how does anyone know this? Sounds to me like a juror has leaked something and that's not good.

Today is Steven's birthday. How sweet would that be if the jury brings back the verdict he wants. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Sea Ray wrote:

Nan11 wrote:
The speculation is rampant that it is because they have a verdict and they just want to sleep on it.

We'll see, folks. We'll soon see. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

That would make sense. It'll be a circus when they announce the verdict so I'm sure they wouldn't want to do that at 5 or 6pm local time. They'd be there all evening. However how does anyone know this? Sounds to me like a juror has leaked something and that's not good.

This is just speculation. Nothing more.

They also said the jury looked very serious as they left last night. The 'talking heads' are offering their opinions, that is all I believe this is.

LiveLaughLove wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Three woman, Amanda Berry, Gina Dejesus and Michelle Knight have been found ALIVE being held in a home in Cleveland..

Sorry for O/T post, but I am sooooo excited for these ladies.

Thank you LLL -- Read about this yesterday but didn't know where to put the good news -- Miracles do happen

Ladytwee wrote:

LiveLaughLove wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Three woman, Amanda Berry, Gina Dejesus and Michelle Knight have been found ALIVE being held in a home in Cleveland..

Sorry for O/T post, but I am sooooo excited for these ladies.

Thank you LLL -- Read about this yesterday but didn't know where to put the good news -- Miracles do happen

Just a reminder to everyone: This is the Jodi Arias thread.

To comment on the three women found, please click on the link provided by LLL. Thanks folks!

Edited to add: If you find your comment missing from this thread, go to: Cases In The News/[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Sea Ray wrote:

Nan11 wrote:

Sea Ray wrote:This doesn't surprise me at all. I felt all along it'd be Tuesday before they came back with a verdict. I might start wonderin' what's going on if things go into Wednesday but I think they're right on track considering the long trial they sat through

Yes, I agree.

Another verdict that I am hanging onto for hope is the Laci Peterson case. That jury deliberated for seven days and came back with two counts of murder--one murder in the first degree for Laci; and one murder in the second degree for their unborn baby, Connor.

I didn't realize that. Thanks for giving us that piece of information.

But I think that was due to one juror holding out and not wanting to listen to the evidence, so they removed him and put in a woman and they came back immediately with a guilty verdict.

Nan11 wrote:

Ladytwee wrote:

LiveLaughLove wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Three woman, Amanda Berry, Gina Dejesus and Michelle Knight have been found ALIVE being held in a home in Cleveland..

Sorry for O/T post, but I am sooooo excited for these ladies.

Thank you LLL -- Read about this yesterday but didn't know where to put the good news -- Miracles do happen

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Just a reminder to everyone: This is the Jodi Arias thread.

To comment on the three women found, please click on the link provided by LLL. Thanks folks!

Nothing new, waiting and I am biting my toe nails. Hope you got plenty of coffee.

Yesterday, like I previous mention Trump was on NG saying that JA had followed him on tweeter and he finally tweeted back( I think that is how he said it). Knowing Trump he was trying to get his `5 minutes of air time as usual.

The Women abuse donations was in question because of where the money was sent. NG was question if JA was getting the money.

Last night was nothing but speculation on what the jurors would do, no one has an iota until they send the note to the court with a verdict..

gpw wrote:Well got banned again on Webslaughter. This time get this I simply reported what a big shot attorney friend told me yesterday.
She said jury reached a temp. verdict yesterday and want to spend some time double checking everthing today.
That's it..I get banned
Bonus question: What does EDT stand for?

Yes, I heard the same thing. Jean Casaras said that it might be that they reached a verdict but wanted to sleep on it, or it could be that one of the jurors had an appt this morning.

Hope it's a verdict.

I am just terrified at the thought of the verdict being anything less than "murder one". THis woman is a psychopath and should never walk the streets again. If set free she will surely do this again.

I think Martinez will be her first victim.

Jodi: like everything else, this trial is not my fault.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Jodi Arias ‏@Jodiannarias 12h
I wanted so much to avoid trial but the State forced it. My only other option was suicide and,well...

Jodi Arias Jodi Arias ‏@Jodiannarias 12h
I would have signed a plea years ago to avoid this disaster, but I was refused a plea as the State and the family refused to settle.

ellejay wrote:Jodi: like everything else, this trial is not my fault.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Jodi Arias ‏@Jodiannarias 12h
I wanted so much to avoid trial but the State forced it. My only other option was suicide and,well...

Jodi Arias Jodi Arias ‏@Jodiannarias 12h
I would have signed a plea years ago to avoid this disaster, but I was refused a plea as the State and the family refused to settle.

Jodi is certainly trying to be in control of her own destiny with wanting to plead out to anything less than felony murder. She actually was blackmailing the state. If you don't accept my plea, the world will learn of the kinky sex and all that goes along with it..paraphrased..

Jodi is a very dangerous mind. She needs to be kept out of society for the rest of her sorry life, if not put to death.

I watched her making some motions with her hands as she disagreed with Juan's assertions against her. One was mouthing, that's bullshit when Juan claims she was not a battered woman.

The other I saw was her making a motion with her right thumb as if slitting his throat..I dont' know what was stated at that point but it's clear to me that Jodi is belligerent and is a danger..

I'll see if I can find those...

OMGoodness...LMBO! Well, I don't think she'll get an appeal on ineffective council, LMBO.
How her case is so complex. LMBO.

And nothing like momma cementing a no go ineffective council appeal.
"Jodi dosen't deserve to be tried for the death penalty." Hummmmm!
"JA has been an "exemplary inmate." That's not what I heard...She has a penchant for pencils and pens not to mention other things she like's to hide. Even had a cell mate that worked her over just as Travis did (EYEROLL).

I love when people like her put everything in writing...

ellejay wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

--Jodi's march 2011 letter to the judge as she "humbly begs" to be allowed to keep kirk nurmi as her attorney, due to the "quality of defense" she would receive w/ him....(HA!)

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

--Jodi's mom's march 2011 letter to the judge----make kirk nurmi stay on! so what if he wants to start his own practise, Jodi has been an exemplary inmate and needs him.....

Jodi Arias Mitigation specialist just entered the court house. I wonder what that is all about.

Katie2 wrote:Jodi Arias Mitigation specialist just entered the court house. I wonder what that is all about.

It's also reported that Willmott also entered the courtroom..

Wonder if a verdict has been reached but no one but the attorney's and family's are told? Naa, can't be...

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Amy Murphy ‏@AMYABC15 49s
#jodiarias juror #9 arriving just now

Amy Murphy ‏@AMYABC15 15m
#jodiarias Prosecutor Juan Martinez just walked in Smiling ear to ear

Amy Murphy ‏@AMYABC15 30m
#jodiarias Jennifer Wilmott walking in to courthouse -